A Rant on Coding and Quality

I am, as Char will no doubt agree, occasionally a bit on the negative side. This isn't always a good thing; I need to learn to tone down my vitriol in situations in which it does not advance my needs, and in those in which it is not necessary or constructive.

There are times, however, that merit a vigorous negative response.

I'm taking two project courses in school this semester; Cmput 414, which is a graphics and multimedia course with a heavy algorithmic programming component, and Cmput 401, a software engineering course and the focus of this rant.

Software Engineering is, according to [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering), "is the application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the development, operation, and maintenance of software." Among other things, it requires the application of good design practices to the development of code, and following beneficial design standards.

So, I have to ask, why is it that people taking this fucking course cannot do something as basic as grok that it is _fundamentally bad practice to add public methods to hidden implementing classes instead of using the goddamned design?!_ I spent three days nailing down, and countless hours tuning up, the data model for our project application, only to have one of my fellow team members simply come along and, instead of _reading the goddamned documentation_, which I provided as a first step, add new hooks into the mechanism, just to get at the information in a way that is not only wrong, but disables some nice and (I thought) needed functionality.

I have spent the last hour looking over his code, marveling at the glorious unification of layers that, according to [good design practices](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-view-controller), should ever remain separate -- the intermingling of UI code and logic that _I'd already written elsewhere, better_ was a real high point for me.

Gods.

I cannot wait to get back to full time work with people who know _more_ than I do, so that instead of raging at the pathetic efforts of people whose skills are not even up to the level of an academic programmer, I can instead find faults with my own approaches, be told that I'm doing it wrong, and learn how to do it _better_.

Comments !